Sex Offender discussing CM's on AP - Polygraph Place Bulletin Board

Thanks for stopping by our bulletin board.
Please take just a moment to register so you can post your own questions
and reply to topics. It is free and takes only a minute to register. Just click on the register link

Polygraph Place Bulletin Board

Professional Issues - Private Forum for Examiners ONLY

Sex Offender discussing CM's on AP

profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Author	Topic: Sex Offender discussing CM's on AP
Taylor Member	posted 11-16-2007 06:26 PM There is a Jeff Saunders on the Anti Site asking about CM's. I looked in the US SO registry and there are three. Jeffrey Scott Saunders 5/2/65 in Tulare CA Jeffrey Travis Saunders 3/5/88 in NC Jeffrey W. Saunders age 37 in VA When he mentioned test questions he knows they will ask he stated one of the questions is 'DY live in NM'. He could be a compact or a fool by using his name - who knows. Anyway, would examiners from these states notify their local AP&P/Corrections Office so they can investigate this guy to determine which one is scheduled for a poly and get him a free pass back to where he belongs. Taylor IP: Logged
rnelson Member	posted 11-16-2007 09:01 PM I was wondering if that was a real name. Great idea Taylor. He'll punch his own ticket soon enough, even if no-one here can find him. Lets just hope he doesn't hurt someone else in the meantime. r ------------------ "Gentlemen, you can't fight in here. This is the war room." --(Stanley Kubrick/Peter Sellers - Dr. Strangelove, 1964) IP: Logged
Ted Todd Member	posted 11-17-2007 06:33 PM Taylor, I got California covered. Don't thank me however as CDC does not polygraph applicants! Ted IP: Logged
sackett Moderator	posted 11-17-2007 10:04 PM Donna, it is not enough to know who is coming in for an examination and if they've researched CM's. This, since I personally make the assumption that everyone has done so. Not to a point of paranoia mind you, but to a level of constant awareness. The problem is, there are way too many examiners out here that are ignorant to CM's, either because they figure since they've been examiners for-ever they can't be beaten or ignorance to CM's because they just don't care anymore. Either way, many examiner's are being "beaten" by smarter examinee's and not even knowing it (hense my last posting concerning FN's). That is the issue we need to address first. Unfortunately, examiner ego is a cliff all too diffucult to scale and correct. Don't beieve me, go to any seminar and listen to the discourse at the local ospitality room.... LOL Once we have every professional examiner on board with george's suggested bathroom reading material, the greater the likelyhood that those who are employing CM techniques will be caught and identified. Our own information and trainig is the best defense. Too bad, many are still sitting on the bench, instead of getting in the game... Best Regards, Jim [This message has been edited by sackett (edited 11-17-2007).] IP: Logged
stat Member	posted 11-17-2007 10:17 PM Saunders isn't real. Nuff said. IP: Logged

All times are PT (US)	next newest topic \| next oldest topic
Administrative Options: Close Topic \| Archive/Move \| Delete Topic
	Hop to:

Contact Us | The Polygraph Place